You're right, that would be a breach of your expectation agreement (also very valid).
But unless your airline promised you leg room, delicious food, and a pleasant experiance in exchange for the ticket fee you're SOL.

I never said you should lick their boots. I'm saying that you could be grateful that the ability to fly even exists and its available to you or you could feel entitled to have them lick your boots.
.
Life hack: If you want happiness in your life i recommend you lean toward gratitude as often as you can. Entitlement makes us bitter. The best part of the whole thing is that its our choice.

I guess we can either be entitled or we can be grateful.

Every company wants to make a bigger profit. That's precisely the reason we even have the option to fly across the world in the first place.
.
Who are we to decide how good sombody's customer service should be? It's their company.

No, you're not forced to do so. You choose to do so because it's the best of your available options (driving, walking, swimming, not going) . That's a huge difference. On one hand you're grateful that some people have worked very hard to make a metal bird escort you quickly and safely to a far away land. On the other hand, you've somehow convinced yourself that you're entitled to a bunch of services when you didn't have anything to do with their exsistance.

The irony is that "toxic masculinity" was a big part of what fought for and won their freedom to say sh*t like that in the first place.

The issue with anything being run by any government is a lack of accountability. If a person starts their own practice because they believe they can deliver a better service at a cheaper price i guarentee you that they'll work their a$$ off to make it work. If its government run, they'll only do the least amount it will take to not get fired or reelected. Innovation, advancement, and investment will fall on its face. And for those of you in single payer countries, you're welcome for all of the discovery and medical advancement that the US produces because the bill for almost all of that innovation is picked up by the people in the USA who pay these large premiums we're always bitching about.

I'm afraid socialism is fundamentally flawed. True freedom means that the power has to always be held by the masses. If someone is suggesting another system (particularly if they're offering themselves as the leader) they are the bad guy.
Minimally corrupted, minimally invasive, free capitalistic society is what sparked that giant leap forward in the quality of life.
We dont need socialism. We need to remove the corruption and allow the system to work.

Just about every single word you just wrote is false.

^

I'm not a religious person but a friend of mine, whom i respect a lot, is. He asked me to read "Letter from a Skeptic". That author would answer your question something like this:
.
God wanted people to have free will. That means people need to poses the ability to make their own choices, even if they're wrong. He would say that God certainly could have made the 'perfect' world you're invisioning but it would look like a bunch of robots absent any color or any real beauty.
.
The book didnt change my mind on religion but it makes me think about countries and governments differently. I think people need that freedom to make the wrong decision, otherwise it's not truly living.

Are you saying that the employer should absorb that 3-5 years of low quality employees?
.
I get that life is hard, that growth is difficult and that none of it is fair. But why should the difficult parts of some peoples lives be transferred to someone else's just because they took the risk to step up and start a company that creates opportunity for others. What you're suggesting sounds like a punishment for the people who create these jobs.

I agree. But we're getting off track.
.
Guest, a few posts ago you asked if i would complain if my relationship, job, parents, etc. were bad. To answer you honesty, i would have to admit that i probably would, at least a little. But i shouldn't. The healthy thing to do is communicate and try to come to an understanding on what a win-win looks like. If i were the factory workers, i would do exactly that with my boss. If the boss and i cant come to terms i would absolutely leave in hopes of a better opportunity. Maybe i'd find a better opportunity or maybe i'd find that what i had at the factory is the best opportunity out there for me. And then i should be grateful that the owner has shouldered the all the risk of owning/starting a company and become appreciative of their willingness to give me money in exchange for my talents, time, and or effort.

In each case, the "leaders" believe the reason it's never worked is that their predecessors weren't as smart as they are, or that they lacked the tools or means.
.
The only society is one where the people have the freedom to both make a better life, and make mistakes.

You'll get no argument from me that a utopian world where everyone contributes as much as they can in whatever field they want and it leads to 100% happiness and 0% conflict is the ideal way of life.
.
But the fundamental problem is that this utopian world cannot allow for true freedom. True freedom means that you have to have the free will to be able to both seek whatever makes you happy AND the freedom to make mistakes.
.
ANY attempt at eliminating all lifestyle inequality, or completely removing all things that might make people feel sad or offended is a world of zombies. There are multiple examples in world history of attempts to remove all of the bad in a society and they ALL end up with the freedoms of the masses being slowly removed until they have to stand up and overthrow the people in power. It has literally always started with the masses believing that this is what they want, then the people in power always grow full to the brim with entitlement, and eventually revolt.