User funsubstanceuser Banned
#irishpride 57 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Smitty of course. Have a look at his other postings in this matter. What the posting says,. whoever is fighting against discrimination is just a weak, butthurt pussy.
▼
Yay! Another Irish post! 17 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Just wait for the next guy to "explain" that the irish actually had it so much harder than those crotchety, fretful "african americans". Turns out even St. Patricks Day is just an instrument of irish (well, gaelic rather) oppression.
▼
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
I actually do not have to believe anything, that is the point. Atheists don't claim they're able to explain everything. All I believe is that science as source of knowledge is preferable to religion, and I accept the limitations of knowledge itself. And scientists never "believed" in the BBT. It has been the best explanation for certain phenomenons, but knowledge is actually in motion. Not because of some random persons reading old fairy tales and deciding what's the least fairy, but with scientists practicing science.
2
Ok, we get it, you vape 24 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
I did in fact, and you didn't answer my question. Did you do the google search you so arrogantly recommended? I guess not. And as to the embracing: I just love that because its always so funny who really is constantly triggered by people offering their opinions. Thanks for proving my point.
▼
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
"your argument about scriptures' trustworthiness is a problem for all religions, including atheism. " - this "atheism is just another religion" bullshit is literally the last straw you bible thumpers have and proof you completely ran out of arguments. . So as you shot your last desperate shot, my job is kind of done here. and @skittles: try and read that passage again where I did NOT call you an asshole. Kind of ironic that YOU are talking about precise text research and shit.
#irishpride 57 comments
#irishpride 57 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
globalresearch has an agenda to put it nicely. The linked article has one only "source": opednews, quite the same agenda. Although in the "writers guide" of opednews it says "Sources and links, when you are making claims, are essential. " there is not a single source or link for anything there. If you google "irish slavery" you get links to exactly the same text and lots and lots of sites debunking that ahistorical racist bullshit. Go fuck yourself, Smitty, for taking the piss out of the irish fate for your racist agenda. Téigh trasna ort féin.
·
Edited 9 years ago
#irishpride 57 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
So where is the Saint Patricks Day for blacks then? As long as there is white denial, blacks won't have "the limelight taken away" from them.
▼
·
Edited 9 years ago
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
"atheists have nothing to threaten with." - which kind of is the point. Try not to be an asshole for the sake of not being an asshole, not because some god might decide to send you to the shitty afterlife-lounge, instead of the great one.
3
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Yea right, except atheists don't exactly threaten religious people they'd rot in hell for not believing the right thing. Believe whatever nonsense you want, no prob, you won't even notice me. Start rationalizing it and pretend some fairytales will answer the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything, or even give these fairy tales remotely the same credit as science, I'll be all in your face.
.
Oh, and this: "I didn't just ignorantly jump into a faith led by some man without asking questions, without research, and blindly accepting...at least not completely."? Really? How many percent to complete a hundred? You don't buy the Immaculate Conception? The Resurrection? The Ascension?
·
Edited 9 years ago
.
Oh, and this: "I didn't just ignorantly jump into a faith led by some man without asking questions, without research, and blindly accepting...at least not completely."? Really? How many percent to complete a hundred? You don't buy the Immaculate Conception? The Resurrection? The Ascension?
Ok, we get it, you vape 24 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
So using racial stereotypes is not racist? This is bullshit. I didn't make that equation you're denying.
Let me clarify: we're all racists, cause we are human beings. I just made a mildly racist joke a little above. You're in control of what you're aware of, but when you deny and suppress it, you're not. It's like turning your back to an enemy. Now mocking on an asians stereotyped inability to pronounce a proper "r" is not the same thing as i.e. comparing black people to apes. Both is racist, but one makes you a little edgy, the other makes you a racist asshole. Don't get triggered. I didn't call you an asshole.
▼
Let me clarify: we're all racists, cause we are human beings. I just made a mildly racist joke a little above. You're in control of what you're aware of, but when you deny and suppress it, you're not. It's like turning your back to an enemy. Now mocking on an asians stereotyped inability to pronounce a proper "r" is not the same thing as i.e. comparing black people to apes. Both is racist, but one makes you a little edgy, the other makes you a racist asshole. Don't get triggered. I didn't call you an asshole.
Ok, we get it, you vape 24 comments
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
@skittles you really, really believe a book that has been translated and edited for 150 years ("latest" version is of 1769?) by mostly unknown people from mostly unknown sources with a (or many?) mostly unknown agenda(s) literally is "the bible!"? I don't know of the subtleties of the "official" english version, but I know a bit of the Luther translation of mid 16th century, which is base of the german bible (constantly amended, latest version 1984 btw) and there are still lots and lots of crude translations and severe cultural misunderstandings. The main point is that the sources of all these bible versions are all inevitably dubious and anything but trustworthy. 14 to 15 centuries (!) of translations and alterations made the whole thing a collection of a few helpful rules for a society (all religions have those in common, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology) plus some regulatory policies plus a lot of poetry. The bible is a fairy tale. Period.
3
·
Edited 9 years ago
The of the brave 12 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
So instead of "more precise" you may rather have said " more like I'm used to". As for intuitive: water freezes at 0°C and boils at 100°C. 0°C is pretty cold, 0°F is too fucking cold, therefore its a minus degree in Celsius.
·
Edited 9 years ago
...And then we go to work 9 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Maybe let @adolfhitler1945 elaborate on that.
btw: anybody remember The Sex Pistols "Belsen was a gas"? What a shitty song...
▼
·
Edited 9 years ago
btw: anybody remember The Sex Pistols "Belsen was a gas"? What a shitty song...
The of the brave 12 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
"Fahrenheit allows for more precise readings for temperature." - Uhm, hardly... thanks to the metric system, the limit of precision of the Celsius system is only determined by the measuring instrument. How much more precise than 0,1 ° Celsius do you need? 0,01°C? 0,001°C?
2
·
Edited 9 years ago
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Its always 100% exactly the same: any time someone sees himself as "sceptical of evolution" it turns out S/he. Just. Doesn't. Know. What. S/he. Is. Talking. About. So someone will not believe we descended from monkeys? Well then his/her opinion doesn't fucking matter, easy as that.
.
Now there is nothing wrong with that in general, nobody knows everything. Not everybody needs to understand what science in general and evolution specifically is. But what's the hubris, the stupidity, to believe one's own opinion, based on a few google searches, kind of outweighs the opinion of pretty much everybody who is an expensively educated expert on the topic, offering peer reviewed, evidence based, fucking educated opinions? Whereas the Doyen of Evolution Critics, Henry M. Morris is a Ph.D in Hydraulic Engineering and had been teaching civil engineering? Everyone would laugh at an evolution biologist criticizing the construction of a bridge or a sewer system. Justly so. Nome sayn?
2
.
Now there is nothing wrong with that in general, nobody knows everything. Not everybody needs to understand what science in general and evolution specifically is. But what's the hubris, the stupidity, to believe one's own opinion, based on a few google searches, kind of outweighs the opinion of pretty much everybody who is an expensively educated expert on the topic, offering peer reviewed, evidence based, fucking educated opinions? Whereas the Doyen of Evolution Critics, Henry M. Morris is a Ph.D in Hydraulic Engineering and had been teaching civil engineering? Everyone would laugh at an evolution biologist criticizing the construction of a bridge or a sewer system. Justly so. Nome sayn?
When you try to argue with religious people 119 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
"are you willing to take a fair look at the evidence I present? Most 'anti-creationists' react in the same way as the creationist depicted in the image. " - You experience it like that because you do not really know what a) science is b) a scientist does c) evidence is. Thus you believe creation.com is a valid source of arguments in a "evolution vs. creationism" debate. Which would make Richard Dawkins look exactly like in the last picture.
5
Money shot 4 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
You threw your cash on pussy last night? Good for you, hope you had protection though
7
I want that 9 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
That's because those super awesome, individual beards make all those those individual guys look pretty much alike. I bet they also have the same super individual colorful flower tattoos.
3
If world war II was a bar fight 20 comments
funsubstanceuser
· 9 years ago
Uhm... what about what Russia did in and after Stalingrad? Kicking the Wehrmacht out of Russia, back to Germany, while occupying half of Europe for 40 years to follow, that's a lot not to be mentioned.
1